- Holy shit, @NFL If you're going to give the games to the Pats, then why even play the goddamned game? #NFL #BillsMafia 04:21:47 PM December 24, 2017 from Twitter Web Client ReplyRetweetFavorite
- @NFL Ruling on the field or OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE! Fucking A. Go #Bills 03:40:24 PM December 24, 2017 from Twitter Lite in reply to NFL ReplyRetweetFavorite
- @rianjohnson ... I know #TheLastJedi will make money, but you shit the bed, man. Worse than the prequels. Ugh. 10:23:40 AM December 24, 2017 from Twitter Lite in reply to rianjohnson ReplyRetweetFavorite
- MFA: Georgia College and State University https://t.co/kLSm0CUlFG 11:53:39 PM August 29, 2017 from WordPress.com ReplyRetweetFavorite
Tag Archives: Faith
So, I had a great response, as well as a few good conversations, about my last post concerning writing about faith, so I thought I’d continue the thought.
But isn’t faith a personal thing? One thing that was brought up that got me thinking about why faith can be difficult to write about was its very personal nature. It’s true, I think. It’s only proven at the individual level, but then again, isn’t everything? Isn’t 2+2? “It’s 5!” shouts Winston Smith.
No, I don’t think this is much of a holdup, necessarily, but it’s true, if the person has not internalized this aspect of their lives, if they simply put it on, as a friend of mine said, “Like an Abercrombie sweater,” they’ll be about as interesting to hear from as someone who parrots the talking heads of political media. So, in this way, yeah, writing about faith can be restricted by the very personal nature, but in general, I’d say no. It is that personal proof that is so compelling, that wish to see what others see or to understand why they see the world as they do.
What’s been done? Well, I talked about Flannery O’Connor and her use of faith in her works the other day. A good friend of mine brought up the excellent book by Graham Greene, The Power & The Glory (one of my favorite titles in fiction), and I began to think about Gabriel Garcia-Marquez’s famous work, “A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings.” I’d like to focus on this story for a moment, as I think it is representative of all of these works.
Marquez is critical of the way we carry out faith. This seems to be the commonality. Essentially, (spoiler alert) an angel drops into this town, and no one knows what to do with it but poke it with sticks, treat it like a freak show, and make money from it. Kind of like how people treat faith? Maybe. Even the town priest doesn’t know what to do. You’d think if anyone would see it for what it is, he would, but he doesn’t. We can often use writing as an indictment of how people use faith, but rarely are we able to see it in a positive light (without being corny) or to bring up other conflicts.
Well, what can the conflicts be? That’s a great question. I mean, if we write a story that includes some involvement by the Judeo-Christian God, we must then accept the things that define God. In which case, where can the conflict be? We’ve just established that there is an all-powerful, all-good, all-just agent in the story, so that doesn’t exactly leave the reader hanging on the edge of his seat in suspense.
No, it seems, as it often does in the Old Testament, that the conflict is exactly as O’Connor or Greene or Marquez imagine it: how man carries out his faith. In Job, the conflict is not man against his trials or man against God, really, but it’s a story where a man must come to grips with the fact that there are things he is not given to know. The conflict seems to always be with himself. In the New Testament, we see this when Jesus says things like “Oh ye, of little faith,” or “If ye had faith as a grain of mustard seed, ye might say unto this sycamine tree, Be thou plucked up by the root, and be thou planted in the sea; and it should obey you.” The problems always come down to man and his perpective on life, on God, on problems, etc.
There are exceptions. Fiction rarely, though sometimes, takes on God directly. Some would argue that Paradise Lost, terrible as it is, does this very thing. A few other famous books have done this as well, though, having not read many, I will reserve comment, but this approach seems more the exception than the rule.
So, what’s hard about this? I’m not sure exactly. It’s just a funny thing to me that faith can be so central to peoples’ lives, and yet, we struggle to write about it in meaningful and personal ways. The best writers seem to be able to come at this topic through curiosity, human interest, and personal experience, but that skill seems rare. Why? Perhaps it comes down to identity. Maybe faith, even more than politics (these two things becoming far too wedded for my liking), is so central to the core of our identities that we struggle to talk about it fairly or with any distance. At best, we talk about the worldview of others, but even then, we can often do no better than to act as a skeptic. And writing that only acts as an intellectual bludgeon to tear down another’s worldview serves little purpose.
Believe in him or not, God is an interesting character. He’s far more complex than any of us like to grant him, and he affects all of us in some manner or another, whether by personal experience, belief, or simply being affected by a person of faith close to us. I do try to explore faith, as I do most topics, in my writing, but I wish I was better at approaching the topic more honestly and more personally.
Besides Greene, C.S. Lewis, O’Connor, Marquez, Tolkien, or Marilynne Robinson, are there other writers that grapple with this topic effectively? If so, how?
Writing about faith is a tricky exercise. I try to dig into why writing about faith, for praise, criticism, or else, can be so difficult.
Seems interesting enough. Writing about faith, whether my own or someone else’s has always been daunting to me. That being said, I can see that the stories in the Bible, particularly those in the Old Testament, are compelling enough. I mean, read them and then read Shakespeare. It’s hard to see MacBeth without thinking about King Saul, or Kent and Coriolanus and not think about David’s captain, Joab.
Still, I struggle to do it. Flannery O’Connor was so great about writing about faith and hypocrisy, and I must admit that it’s a lot easier to be critical than to present faith in a positive fashion. But why is this? I mean, faith affects people so deeply that they base their entire life and choices on it, yet the stories we base on it are often corny, dry, and uninteresting. Why?
What do you know about it? I know a decent amount about it. I’ve written a number of plays when I was a kid for church, and recently, I wrote a screenplay for a friend of mine based on someone he knows. The story is a beautiful one. Essentially, it is because of a man’s faith that he is able to overcome powerful suicidal thoughts and urges. I mean, isn’t that a compelling story? And yet, it’s hard to pull off … at least for me. And I don’t think I’m alone in this.
To struggle with this topic, or worse, to avoid it, is problematic. One of my favorite professors, Dr. Elisabeth Däumer taught me an important lesson about things like this. She told me that the worst thing I could do is dismiss something. I need to engage with it, whether that means to be critical or loving, fair or unfair, to do a work or idea justice. Still, faith, something that is so close to me, presents problems for me.
So, what’s the problem? Well, upon thinking about it, I think there are a few reasons why writing about faith can be problematic. 1.) I think people are too close to it, one way or the other. As in, I think, very often, writing about faith essentially becomes propaganda. We want our readers to love our way of thinking about faith (or lack of faith), and we don’t have enough distance from it to speak on it fairly. 2.) I think that when the solution to a problem is an all-powerful God … it kind of makes the conflict weak. I mean, it’s like having Superman with you all of the time … except Superman is eternally more powerful. How can anyone lose?
Thing about it is, modern Christian writers rarely seem to present faith like Old Testament writers. I mean, we may write about someone’s miraculous healing or salvation or something, but we rarely have God put them in that predicament. I mean, think about Abraham and Isaac. As Dylan wrote,
Oh God said to Abraham, “Kill me a son”
Abe says, “Man, you must be puttin’ me on”
God say, “No.” Abe say, “What?”
God say, “You can do what you want Abe, but
The next time you see me comin’ you better run”
Well Abe says, “Where do you want this killin’ done?”
God says, “Out on Highway 61
Maybe it’s just that. Maybe we struggle to see the complexity of the relationship between God and man as pictured in holy texts. Seems like we’re fond of easy, fill-in-the-blank answers. Sadly, readers don’t find those sorts of conflicts all that interesting … because they’re not real. Conflicts are always complex because humans are complex.
Well, there you go. Yeah, seems like that is the answer. We’ll see if I can work to approach that. I don’t know. I do in ways, but never in a direct fashion. How have you had issues incorporating faith (or lack of faith) into your writing?